Skip to content 
ChatGPT just got smarter – and now you get to decide exactly how smart it should be. OpenAI’s new water-testing feature, dubbed “Thinking Effort,” allows you to change the level of intellectual horsepower your AI assistant devotes to each subsequent answer. It’s kind of akin to opting between a short answer and a professor’s long explanation.
This groundbreaking control manual system arose after GPT-5’s release was mocked for being too slow and over-engineered. Users said they were struggling to obtain basic information without receiving needlessly complicated responses. Today, ChatGPT introduces a new set of 4 tiers of level of effort, putting even more fine-grained control into how much computational budget is applied to your question.
It is a sea change in strategy for A.I. performance, the feature. Instead of generic replies, you decide whether ChatGPT should sprint to a response or marathon through deep consideration. This UX enhancement helps resolve some significant reliability issues, and at the same time, creates new opportunities for casual and professional users.
What "Thinking Effort" Actually Does
THE THINKING EFFORT CHATGPT2 feature will transform the way ChatGPT handles your input. Rather than processing with a fixed amount of computational intensity, the system now performs processing steps with your selected effort level.
Here’s how the computational budget system works:
| Effort Level | Computational Units | Processing Time | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Light | 5 units | 1-2 seconds | Quick facts, simple questions |
| Standard | 18 units | 3-5 seconds | General tasks, conversations |
| Extended | 48 units | 8-12 seconds | Complex analysis, research |
| Max | 200 units | 15-30 seconds | Expert-level problems |
As you choose a higher level of thinking effort, ChatGPT is then doing more reasoning steps behind the scenes. Your invisible layer. When people say that what really happens is this black-box model that’s consuming all kinds of data, what they’re usually talking about is a huge computational process – things like fact-checking multiple solutions, or self-verification: that it all hangs together, and that’s all invisible to you.
The system takes advantage of what OpenAI refers to as “reasoning tokens,” the unseen thinking steps that occur before generating your visible response. As a result, at Max, ChatGPT may produce thousands of these hidden tokens, essentially arguing with itself about the best answer.
This method is a way to address a key performance challenge in AI. Earlier versions either thought too little (missing subtleties) or too much (devoting time to easy questions). Now ChatGPT thinks only as hard as your question requires.
Light → Max: Pick the Right Thinking Level
Once you know what each setting has to offer, picking the right “effort” level is a no-brainer. The trick is to match the level of computation to the level you really need.
Light Thinking is great for the immediate stuff. Use it when you need ChatGPT to quickly look something up, make rudimentary computations, or work through basic questions. The reaction time is near instantaneous, and the conversations are as organic as they can be.
Standard Thinking does almost all of everyone’s daily interactions just fine. And here the well-balanced users got each time a reasonable response each time without unnecessary delays. It’s great for jotting out emails, light researching, and general problem-solving, where you want a proven, accurate answer but don’t want to wait.
Complexity Thinking Enables a Deeper Analysis of Complex ProblemsExtended thinking is the contrast of the second type of thinking, known as complexity thinking. Select this level when solving multi-step problems or when planning strategies for solution methods or detailed analysis. From there, ChatGPT will take additional time to think through multiple perspectives and different types of solutions.
Find out more Max Thinking Max Thinking is expert advice to give you real confidence in answering even your most challenging questions. This level of computational power works great for high-level coding, scientific/numerical analysis, and in-depth research where quality is more important than speed.
The intelligent plan is to begin low and increase if necessary. If the first answer from ChatGPT looks bad, just ask him the same question with a higher level of thought. This performance approach cuts down your timing and guarantees the right depth, whenever required.
Why OpenAI Added an Effort Dial
Thinking effort was a direct result of users after the GPT-5 release provided this feedback. Early versions erred on the side of analytical thoroughness at the expense of the user experience, leaving users demanding fast answers to easy questions.
The first try was marred by reliability issues. ChatGPT tended to overcomplicate rather than simplify user input, which would result in poor user experiences. The AI appeared incapable of properly calibrating the computing power it devoted to the intensity of the task.
OpenAI’s reply to its critics was about fine-grained control, not automation. Rather than attempting to read their users’ minds, they opted to give manual controls directly to users. This fine-tuning places control in the hands of users, the ones who know their own demands and deadlines best.
The feature also responds to performance concerns coming from enterprise customers. Businesses require predictable AI competency across various tasks. A law firm reviewing contracts should want maximum analysis depth, whereas a customer service team would want to achieve the fastest response time for daily questions.
This user-led philosophy of control is symptomatic of a larger transformation occurring within AI. Instead of building a series of ever-more-complicated robot overmen, OpenAI has opted to let users take the wheel of policy creation for them. The outcome enhances performance as well as user response in a variety of use scenarios.
Real-world Uses: When to Make ChatGPT Think Harder
Different professions and tasks benefit from specific effort level selections. Understanding these patterns helps you maximize AI effectiveness while minimizing wait times.
Professional scenarios demanding Max's effort
- Legal contract analysis and regulatory compliance research
- Complex financial modeling and investment strategy development
- Advanced software debugging and architecture planning
- Scientific research synthesis and hypothesis testing
Business applications are perfect for Extended thinking
- Market research and competitive analysis
- Strategic planning and risk assessment
- Content strategy development across multiple platforms
- Technical documentation and process optimization
The play plan entails the detection of configurations of complexity. If there are several variables to solve for, the question is a mix-and-match, or the accuracy requirement is high, then pick a higher thinking effort. For simple look-ups or friendly help, lighter environments offer a better experience quality.
Companies, for their part, report a massive increase in operational efficiency achieved by training teams on when to choose each effort level. If you’re ever contacted by one of our Customer Support team, they speak to you in Light to answer questions asked in the FAQ, or, if they are currently solving a more technical case, in Extended.
Speed vs Depth: The Tradeoff Explained
The effortful thinking system establishes a reciprocity between depth of analysis and speed of response. This tradeoff is a reminder of when you want to take each factor seriously.
Response latency differs widely across the different levels of effort. The light thinking serves answers in 1-2 seconds, while the Max effort sometimes takes 15-30 seconds for complex problems. This lag time between the two modalities is due to the computational operations involved in the underlying processes ChatGPT carries out.
Higher intensity computation is not always justified by quality improvements. For simple questions, Light thought often yields perfectly adequate results. In many cases, officers are already capable of acting in a matter of seconds, so minor increases in accuracy don’t really make up for the difference.
Resource allocation considerations, in particular for API users, are also cost-driven. Gre Allocating capability wisely requires trading off answer quality with budget.
Research on user engagement suggests that answer time expectations depend on the context. People will wait for more complicated analysis and results, but for simple questions, they want answers immediately. The thought effort system sets the timing of AI output to be in line with the expectations of human users.
Most users’ sweet spot will be Light for mundane tasks, Standard for general work, and Extended for critical analysis. Max effort is simply not something you dilute or toss around with any situation that doesn’t warrant in-depth examination.
What This Means for GPT-5 and Beyond
The thinking effort function is a clear indicator of OpenAI’s dedication to user-driven AI progress. Instead of being stuck with a set of predetermined AI behaviors, future models could let users go even further in the way of customization.
According to Figure F1 in GPT-5, the underlying structure provides a high degree of reasoning abilities that could be exploited by the thinking effort system. This four-level approach is intended to form the backbone of more granular manual adjustments up to publication in future versions.
Competition with other AI companies is forcing constant iteration of user settings. Google’s Gemini and Anthropic’s Claude are building analogous fine-grained controls to the point where granular control becomes table stakes rather than a premium feature.
The integration of developer tools is the logical next phase of evolution.” Reasoning effort parameters are added to APIs so that applications can automatically scale computation power to fit the demand of the task. Both users and developers acquire this system reliability improvement.
Future developments will be customizable effort profiles that know your preferences based on your history. And maybe someday, ChatGPT will recommend the best effort level for your question habits and history.
The consequences are more far-reaching than mere response tailoring. This level of granular control shows how you can keep complex AI systems user-friendly while providing professional-level operational reliability.
Frequently Asked Questions
Not necessarily. You would typically expect perfect answers for simple questions with ChatGPT in Light mode. Greater effort shines for complex tasks that need scrutiny.
All levels are provided (with some usage restrictions) to ChatGPT Plus users. API users are billed according to computed budgets, with Max effort 10-fold more expensive than Light.
Yes! You can set a thinking effort for any single message. ChatGPT has no recollection of your choice of attempts, so you have full direct control over every response.
When OpenAI was Tested by Hand, Things Worked Better. Then the researchers looked at manning the systems themselves. Users are better equipped to make these judgments regarding their urgency and quality than an AI can guess.
Right now, thought effort is in beta with ChatGPT Plus and Pro subscribers. Free users will probably have some limited access to higher effort levels when the feature fully launches.
